Category Archives: Logical Fallacies

Protected: Fact Sword: Separating Science from Opinions

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in Burden of Proof, Fact Evaluation, Logical Fallacies, Philosophy of Science, Rationale | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: Demarcation Draft

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in Burden of Proof, Fact Evaluation, Logical Fallacies, Philosophy of Science, Rationale | Enter your password to view comments.

Requesting Definitions or Evidence Carries no Burden of Proof (and Bayesian Analysis’ Fatal Flaw)

I treasure my lifetime subscription to Skeptical Inquirer magazine. I’ve probably learned more about evaluating scientific claims from reading it over the past several decades than from any other single source. Recently, along with the typical torrent of terrific articles … Continue reading

Posted in Bayesian Analysis, Burden of Proof, Fact Evaluation, Logical Fallacies, Philosophy of Science, Rationale | 1 Comment

Doublespeak – Fact Manipulation

“Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur“ (meaning — incomprehensiblity is no reason for you to take an idea seriously) Doublespeak is the use of words to misleadingly hide, disguise, inflate or reverse unpleasant meaning, or meaninglessness. The Four Kinds of … Continue reading

Posted in Fact Evaluation, Logical Fallacies, Rationale | Leave a comment

Logical Fallacies Do Not Require Intent

Some people mistakenly believe that a logical fallacy requires an intent to deceive. The truth is — “The logical nature of a fallacy is independent of the intention of the party using it.” From — “The science of logic; an … Continue reading

Posted in Logical Fallacies | Leave a comment